<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Browser in next release of Internet Tablet Software?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dillernet.com/apple/2006/03/27/new-browser-in-next-release-of-internet-tablet-software/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dillernet.com/apple/2006/03/27/new-browser-in-next-release-of-internet-tablet-software/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=new-browser-in-next-release-of-internet-tablet-software</link>
	<description>An Exploration of Technology and Devices</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 03:35:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: avatar</title>
		<link>http://dillernet.com/apple/2006/03/27/new-browser-in-next-release-of-internet-tablet-software/comment-page-1/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>avatar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 10:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dillernet.com/apple/?p=116#comment-60</guid>
		<description>And the fact that in the maemo svn repo there is a browser with the option of enabling either webcore or mozilla as the rendering engine probably adds a little extra weight to this theory too. See here https://stage.maemo.org/svn/maemo/projects/browser/ besides why would Nokia want to continue to pay license fees for a product they are developing inhouse using free software. I can see the reasons for using Opera to fill a gap so as to get the product to market quickly was done, but there is no reason to continue to keep using it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the fact that in the maemo svn repo there is a browser with the option of enabling either webcore or mozilla as the rendering engine probably adds a little extra weight to this theory too. See here <a href="https://stage.maemo.org/svn/maemo/projects/browser/" rel="nofollow">https://stage.maemo.org/svn/maemo/projects/browser/</a> besides why would Nokia want to continue to pay license fees for a product they are developing inhouse using free software. I can see the reasons for using Opera to fill a gap so as to get the product to market quickly was done, but there is no reason to continue to keep using it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

